没时间翻译，大家自己看吧。
http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/ ... -interesting-thing/
One of those we thought was most intriguing was that drives often needed replacement for issues that SMART drive status polling didn't or couldn't determine, and 56% of failed drives did not raise any significant SMART flags (and that's interesting, of course, because SMART exists solely to survey hard drive health); other notable patterns showed that failure rates are indeed definitely correlated to drive manufacturer, model, and age;
failure rates did not correspond to drive usage except in very young and old drives (i.e. heavy data "grinding" is not a significant factor in failure); and there is less correlation between drive temperature and failure rates than might have been expected,
and drives that are cooled excessively actually fail more often than those running a little hot.
[
本帖最后由 tommy 于 2007-2-22 02:53 编辑 ]
